The next generation of payment technology (and why it matters)

Written by Joe Parkin

Joe is COO of FCF Pay, an experienced entrepreneur and is passionate about using blockchain technology to make the global economy more inclusive and fair.

The evolution of money and payments

A large part of people’s day to day lives revolves around the exchange of goods and services for other goods and services. In our work, we produce products or provide services that others want or need and spend the money we earn on things we want or need.

Since the beginning of human society, we have been through several major changes in the way we trade. Very roughly, one could say those phases were:

  1. Bartering: direct exchange
    • I have a cow, you have chickens. We swap chickens for the cow.
  2. Exchange for scarce resource
    • I have a cow, you have gold. I exchange my cow for gold and acquire other things with the gold. 
  3. Resource-backed currency
    • Instead of carrying around gold, or similar, paper notes or coins represent an amount of a scarce resource such as gold, which is stored in a vault.
  4. Fiat currency
    • Modern currencies such as Euro, USD and GBP are fiat currencies and are not backed by any real-world resources. Many people believe it is, but it is not. Fiat currencies were created to provide central banks and governments with greater control over the economy as they can create as much or as little of it as they wish, while theoretically balancing the inflation caused by increases in money supply (which dilutes the value of circulating currency) with interest rates and other devices.
  5. Digital payments
    • Nowadays, the majority of all payments are digital, which means that physical currency is no longer required for the majority of transactions, at least in western countries.
  6. The 6th step in this evolution is blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.

Fiat; over-centralised and over-controlled?

The efficacy of fiat currencies to stabilise the economy is easy to criticise as we can simply observe the continued cycle of boom and bust we are all too familiar with, soaring inflation and growing discontent. More and more people are realising that the narrative of “things getting more expensive” due to inflation is actually due to “the decreasing value of our money”.

The other side to the argument against the current model is the ever-increasing level of centralisation and control that is held by governments and banks. In an ideal world, this wouldn’t matter, but when the money supply, interest rates, etc. are used as political tools by groups with competing political views, one can hardly hope for stability and long-term planning. Similarly, it is hard to imagine that policies regarding the free movement of funds between individuals, companies and nations are legislated for in a neutral manner under such circumstances.

Modern digital fiat payment systems rely on incredibly complex centralised ledgers (lists of transactions). The centralisation of these ledgers means that the companies behind them are able to exert massive control over the markets.

If you physically give some fiat currency to someone else, you no longer have it. This is intuitive, and is what we imagine is happening during all of our transactions even today; we visualise physical money flying through the air to its destination.

However, this is only true when speaking of physical currency; paper bills and coins. The reality is that the majority of fiat currency doesn’t even exist in physical form. It is, for the most part, just numbers on computers. In order to keep track of who has sent what to whom and, therefore, each individual’s balance, we rely on intermediaries. Sometimes, MANY intermediaries!

Blockchain offers an alternative. The main concept that makes blockchain technology key to the transition away from the current model is the ability to transfer ownership of digital assets without the need for a centralised ledger. Put simply, it makes digital assets more like physical ones. 

A return to decentralisation

In a decentralised system, individuals store their own wealth in whatever form they choose and/or is commonly accepted in their society. As time has passed, this has become less and less frequent, largely due to concerns about security. “My money is safer in the bank’s vault than under my mattress”, we assume.

Blockchain wallets are essentially highly secure electronic bank vaults that we can access from anywhere. What people often fail to realise is that a more decentralised system is simply a return to what has been done for most of human history; self custody of one’s own savings.

So, in summary, despite how complex many people believe blockchain technology and crypto to be, sending 1 USDT, for example, on the blockchain is much more similar to handing over a physical dollar bill than if you sent a bank transfer of 1 USD.

The broader implications are wide-reaching and potentially world-changing. 

  • How much control do we want over our own funds?
  • Should we continue to allow governments and central banks to control the money supply, inflation and interest rates?
  • How do we maintain a proper balance between decentralisation and security; both individual and collective.


So, what are your thoughts on the subject of increased decentralisation? Leave your comments below.


  1. Robert Denman

    The future is moving away from fiat, the world is changing and this is where its going to.

    • joe

      Some people are afraid of change, personally I embrace it! Change brings opportunities to learn and grow.

  2. Jay Kay

    Excellent write up again Joe. Really informative. Keep them coming.

  3. Lee

    Hey Joe, great article again.

    What are your thoughts on security around peoples wallets, we see people getting scammed all the time through dusting, people giving up their seed phrase etc.

    How hard would it be to add in security a bit like 2FA where transactions in or out of a wallet have to be approved. If a transaction hasn’t been approved in X amount of time the transaction reverses or cancels.

    I feel security needs to be improved in this area.

    What are your thoughts on this?

  4. Sean

    Being able to pay daily expenses with your virtual card and now with the physical one has been real eye opening and awesome. Finally using crypto as intended! Keep the interesting articles coming Joe.

  5. Sean

    Being able to pay daily expenses with your virtual card and now with the physical one has been real eye opening and awesome. Finally using crypto as intended! Keep the interesting articles coming Joe.

  6. Travis

    In order for cryptocurrencies to be truly adopted we need to fully intergrade the blockchain into our every day lives. Meaning, we must be paid in crypto rather than in fiat and transfer to crypto. Is there any plans for FCF to fulfil this need and work with companies on paying their employees directly in stable coin?

    • joe

      Our mission is to make it possible to pay for anything, anywhere with crypto. In the mid to long-term, there will be absolutely no need to use the fiat system whatsoever.

      Regarding your question… Actually, yes! FCF Pay has been built according to a very extensive roadmap, which includes yet-to-be-released features such as payroll, escrow and security deposits (for car har and similar situations).

  7. Gregor

    Full crypto adoption in our day to day life will take some time and it can’t be done during the night, I believe till then some hybrid fiat-crypto system will help a lot and that’s something FCF team have covered with expected The App.

    • joe

      Absolutely! We can’t expect to jump directly from the current system to a fully decentralised blockchain-based system. We need to blend with the current system and let the advantages of blockchain technology speak for itself.

  8. John Shaun

    Great job summarising the history of money and highlighting key issues with Fiat!

    I believe decentralising the monetary system and financial sector will lead to increased prosperity, both socio-economical and political.

    The final question about the balance between security and decentralisation is an important one; I think most people tend towards extremes, possibly to take a mental shortcut. Haven’t quite made up my mind on that one, as I still have so much to learn about this rapidly changing technology!

    • joe

      Thanks, John!

      I totally agree. Genuinely free flow of funds between people, companies and countries would give a massive boost to the economy, especially if coupled with an end to runaway inflation.

      I will be diving into the matter of security in multiple posts in the near future.

  9. wulth

    Separation of money from state control is vital for democracy and independence.

    The problem is, those in control of the money, do no want to give up that control.

    • joe

      Perhaps we need to politely remind them that we are in charge, not them. We can do that through pacific actions such as choosing to use cryptocurrencies that are not affiliated with a particular state, for example.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Interested in cashback, discounts and exclusive offers?

We are proud to introduce $FCF Loyalty and Membership Experience; the best way to get the best experience from FCF products and services.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This